Math-1710 · mathematics · Graph theory

Math-1710

Cheeger constants of nets in transitive graphs

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

For a graph $H$, write $\partial_H A$ for the vertices outside $A$ adjacent to some vertex of $A$. Define \[ h(H)=\inf_A\frac{|\partial_H A|}{|A|}, \] where $A$ ranges over nonempty finite vertex sets if $H$ is infinite, and over $0<|A|\le |V(H)|/2$ if $H$ is finite. Distances below are shortest-path distances with every edge of length one.

Let $G$ be a connected locally finite vertex-transitive graph and let $k\ge1$ be an integer. Choose any set $N\subseteq V(G)$ maximal under inclusion subject to $d_G(x,y)\ge k$ for distinct $x,y\in N$. The associated $k$-net graph $G_k$ has vertex set $N$, with an edge between two distinct members whenever their distance in $G$ is at most $2k$. Maximality implies every vertex of $G$ lies within distance less than $k$ of $N$.

Whenever $G_k$ has at least two vertices, must \[ h(G_k)\ge h(G)? \] The assertion quantifies over every maximal separated set, not just the existence of a particularly well-chosen net. It covers both finite and infinite transitive graphs. Its comparison uses vertex expansion, so replacing the boundary by an edge count would be a different numerical assertion. The net retains adjacency at scale $2k$ while discarding most original vertices; the question is whether this coarsening can ever reduce the Cheeger constant in the transitive setting.

Short English statement

Can passage to any maximal graph net reduce the vertex Cheeger constant of a transitive graph?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.