Math-2174 · mathematics · Geometry

Math-2174

Boundaries of Groups and Kleinian Groups — Problem 21

Status Open · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedOpenOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Let a group $G$ act geometrically on two proper CAT(0) spaces $X_1,X_2$. Thus both actions are proper, cocompact and isometric, and each space satisfies Euclidean upper triangle comparison. Let $Z_i=\partial_\infty X_i$ be its visual boundary, defined by bounded-distance classes of geodesic rays with the cone topology.

A compact metric space $K$ is cell-like if it has the shape of a point. Concretely, after embedding it in a Hilbert cube, it can be contracted to a point inside every neighborhood of its image. A continuous surjection is cell-like when every point preimage is cell-like.

Must there exist a compact metrizable space $Z$ and continuous surjections \[ Z\xrightarrow{\ p_1\ }Z_1,\qquad Z\xrightarrow{\ p_2\ }Z_2 \] such that both $p_1$ and $p_2$ are cell-like? This is the common-domain formulation explicitly requested in the source.

Neither $Z$ nor the two maps are required to carry compatible $G$-actions. Requiring equivariance gives a stronger problem. The assertion also does not require either map to be injective: collapsing cell-like fibers is what permits different homeomorphism types. Ordinary shape equivalence is already known in this setting, but a statement of shape equivalence alone does not construct the specific common compactum and cell-like maps requested here. The same group, rather than two unrelated groups, acts on both CAT(0) models.

Short English statement

Do any two CAT(0) boundaries of the same group have a common compactum mapping cell-like onto both?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.