An order-statistic form of Shen's deficit conjecture
Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified
Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpenStatement
Definitions and mathematical statement
Let $G$ be a finite simple loopless directed graph on $n$ vertices, with at most one arc from one vertex to another, and suppose every vertex has positive out-degree. Write $d^+(v)=|\{w:v\to w\}|$. Its directed girth $g$ is the least length of a directed cycle with distinct vertices; such a cycle exists because the finite graph has no vertex of out-degree zero. Opposite arcs are allowed, in which case $g$ may equal two.For any positive integer $r$, define the total deficit below out-degree $r$ by \[ t(G,r)=\sum_{v\in V(G)}\max\{0,r-d^+(v)\}. \] Vertices of degree at least $r$ contribute zero, so surplus degree does not cancel another vertex's deficit. Shen's conjecture asks whether every such graph and every $r\geq1$ satisfy \[ n\geq r(g-1)+1-t(G,r). \] Equivalently, the total deficit should obey $t(G,r)\geq r(g-1)+1-n$ whenever the right side is positive. When the minimum out-degree is at least $r$, the deficit vanishes and the assertion recovers the familiar degree--girth inequality. Here the question is whether the same obstruction persists with precisely one unit of allowed vertex-count loss for each missing outgoing neighbor. No regularity condition is assumed, and there is no restriction on in-degrees. Counting distinct outgoing neighbors, rather than arbitrary parallel arcs, is essential to the stated numerical bound.
Short English statement
Can the degree--girth bound be extended by subtracting exactly the total amount by which vertex out-degrees fall below a chosen threshold?Sources
- S1 ULAM.AI and the UnsolvedMath Contributors, supplied problems.json, record 20001076 (AIM-COMBINATORICS-0201), AIM Workshop Problem Lists. Catalogue identity and source transcription; CC BY 4.0. https://huggingface.co/datasets/ulamai/UnsolvedMath.
- S2 American Institute of Mathematics, The Caccetta-Haggkvist conjecture, item 6. Original workshop question underlying AIM-COMBINATORICS-0201. https://aimath.org/WWN/caccetta/caccetta.pdf.
Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file
Contributions 0
No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.