Math-3407 · mathematics · Algebra

Math-3407

Algebraic Stories — The $k$-rank of monomials

Status Partially solved · unsolvedmath.comLLM status Open unverified

Top Open Problems Not reported cataloguedPartially solvedOpen

Statement

Definitions and mathematical statement

Shared notation.
$\mathbb N=\{1,2,\ldots\}$, and $\mathbb Z,\mathbb Q,\mathbb R,\mathbb C$ denote the integers, rationals, reals and complex numbers. Any other conventions are specified locally.

Let $S=\mathbb C[x,y]$, and let $S_e$ denote its homogeneous degree-$e$ forms. For $f\in S_{kd}$, let $\operatorname{rk}_k(f)$ be the smallest number of terms in a decomposition $f=\sum_jg_j^k$ with $g_j\in S_d$. Define $R_{k,d}=\max_{f\in S_{kd}}\operatorname{rk}_k(f)$, the maximal $k$-rank of binary forms.Let $k\geq3$, $d\geq1$ and $a,b\geq0$ satisfy $a+b=kd$. Define $s,t\in\{0,\ldots,k-1\}$ by $a\equiv s\pmod k$ and $b\equiv t\pmod k$.

Statement recorded in the supplied source.
The bound $\operatorname{rk}_k(x^ay^b)\leq\max(s,t)+1$ is given in the source. Is it always an equality? \[\operatorname{rk}_k(x^ay^b)=\max(s,t)+1.\] [S2]

Short English statement

Is the known upper bound for binary monomials, determined by their exponents modulo $k$, always exact?

Sources

Catalogue entry

Statement licence: CC-BY-4.0 · Source file

Contributions 0

No attempts yet. Significant partial results and substantial reductions are welcome. Contribute an attempt.