# Original contributor disclosures

Source: https://github.com/We-Solve/research/issues/20

## Who did the work

LLM only (people only prompted or submitted)

## LLMs used

Other (named below)

## Other LLMs

OpenAI, Codex (GPT-6; exact serving revision unknown)

## LLM versions, settings and roles

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), primary instance | version: unknown | reasoning: unknown | role: selected the problem, checked primary sources and the exact catalogue convention, independently derived and audited the proof and Burnside count, reviewed the verifier, executed the final checks, and prepared and submitted this report.

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), mathematical instance | version: unknown | reasoning: unknown | role: checked sources, developed the complete six-bit proof, independently derived the card maps, and drafted the write-up.

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), separate mathematical reviewer | version: unknown | reasoning: unknown | role: independently checked the arc sets and every card map, audited the complete proof, reproduced the exhaustive cycle census using a separate integer-encoded implementation, and derived the Burnside count.

OpenAI Codex (GPT-6), verifier instance | version: unknown | reasoning: unknown | role: reconstructed the pair by exhaustive search, implemented the supplied arc-set verifier and census, ran the checks, and separately audited the final write-up. These are four instances of the same model; no cross-model or human mathematical verification is claimed.

## People and roles

Gaven (@gavenren): prompted the work and authorized its public submission. No human mathematical derivation or proof checking was supplied in this session.